The Euro humanistic
is pleased to host this site
legibus solutis, respublica stare non-potest
(These laws being removed, the republic cannot stand)
Our Proposed Constitutional
man can be convicted of any crime where it would
be arguably clearly contrary to good human conscience
to be found guilty in other words, a fundamental
overriding principle in the constitution is to allow
for acts that are in an objective sense "in good
law can be effective against a man who acts
"in good Christianly conscience" and
that is all
his defence has to be
brief argument on the
Sir Conrad Black
Hominum sententia fallax
"the judgmental opinions of men is fallible"
Its about time Conrad Black was exonerated
as he was never rightly accused of anything!
Nor should he have been
imprisoned before having the chance to clear himself on appeal against these
baseless charges, (he wasn't
leaving town or anything).
The Trial Judge can only be described as persistently in a delusional sort of
fixation in negating a man for no apparent reason other than he is not the
openly venomous type that has been set upon him from the outset. It was them
"collectively" that endangered the shareholders (who lost a great fortune from
Blacks departure) rather than Conrad Blacks conduct having been the reason for
this. As such she is altogether seeming "out of line" with the facts of the case
and its complete lack of merit - to the point of making her role in this
altogether irrelevant on the right basis of judicial incompetence - no less!
The Press is equally in on this with only some rare exceptions. At this time the
man stands convicted only of one count of "Obstruction" as he was found Not
Guilty on almost All the fraud charged against him and what he was wrongly
convicted of was rejected on appeal - based on the honesty of his case.
Get off of it huh! You almost killed this man with incessant threats of a
century behind bars when he has been all along innocent. The monies he was paid
as "non compete payments" are completely an honest and valid way to have given
value to all involved - including the Hollinger shareholders who benefited from
Decisions on executive compensation and matters relating to disposal of
corporate assets such as an individual Newspaper within a chain, are matters for
the Board and cannot be viewed as an exigency requiring an urgent consultation
with individual shareholders of a large Publicly held company. When personal
issues arise such as the involvement of a personal guarantee of a Company
President in respect of his own employment prospects in the future (by offering
a non-compete guarantee to a buyer of a corporate asset as indicated) the issues
involved can be resolved by a Board ratification of the arrangement rather than
asking for shareholder involvement where the circumstances can clearly enough
be dealt with by a conscientious quorum of company members and oversight
professionals attached to the firm.
As such the press is practicing propaganda tactics of not making all this clear.
You have to be a nut like George bush before you can set the rules on this
continent - failing which they simply seem to act like a bunch of banana
republicans - Press and all!
If Conrad Black hadn't taken the money in that he received for granting
non-compete arrangements - his company (Hollinger) would have been the biggest
likely losers - as the buyers would have rightly been entitled to just walk
Black has the genius of a following to take over in any town a newspaper already
exists - and those that paid him not to compete did so to deprive him of his
freedom to do so as would normally would be the case.
We were pleased to undertake a project to reach 100,000 top lawyers
internationally (mainly in the United states and some countries in Europe
including the UK) with a couple of rounds of emailed documents intended to clear
Conrad Black on all charges. We did this just prior to the matter being referred
to appeal in Chicago initially. We are pleased with the response. The documents
were also sent as an amicus offering directly to the judges at the appeal level
Our latest (imprimatur) pending effort at the courts
Beneficium dignis ubi des,
"Where you confer a benefit on the
worthy, you oblige all men"